Measure Theory (V): Lebesgue Integration (II)
23 Oct 2018In this post, we extend the Lebesgue integral from nonnegative measurable functions to all measurable functions.
Measurable functions
Recall that the positive part and negative part of $f$ are defined by $f^+=\max(f,0)$, $f^-=-\min(f,0)$, with the following properties:
- $f^+,f^-\geq0$;
- $f^+-f^-=f$; and
- $f^++f^-=\lvert f\rvert$.
Then we can just define the Lebesgue integral of $f$ by
whenever RHS is defined (ie. when the two integrals are not both $\infty$). We say that $f$ is $\mu$-integrable, or integrable, if both integrals on RHS are finite.
Note that this definition agrees with the previous definition on nonnegative measurable functions, since for any $f\geq0$ we have $f^+=f$ and $f^-=0$.
For convenience, we write
for any measurable set $A\in\Sigma$.
Proposition: The Lebesgue integral satisfies the following properties on all measurable functions:
-
Linearity: For all $c\in\bb R$, we have
- Monotonicity: If $f\geq g$, then $\int\!f\,d\mu\geq\int\!g\,d\mu$.
- $\int\!\lvert f\rvert\,d\mu=0$ if and only if $f=0$ $\mu$-a.e.
- If $f=g$ $\mu$-a.e., then $\int\!f\,d\mu=\int\!g\,d\mu$.
- $f$ is integrable if and only if $\lvert f\rvert$ is integrable.
Note that it is possible for the Lebesgue integral to be undefined; thus, whenever we say that two integrals are equal, we mean the following: if one of the integrals is defined, then both are defined and are equal to each other.
Proof: (1): We have
To prove additivity, we essentially analyse each combination of the signs of the functions. Given measurable functions $f,g$, define
and similarly $S_{-+}^+,S_{-+}^-,S_{- -}$: the subscripts indicate the signs of $f,g$, and the superscripts indicate the sign of $f+g$. Then
Now note that
and similarly for the other three cases. Plugging these six integrals into the previous expression and collecting terms gives
(2): This follows from the fact that $f\geq g$ implies $f^+\geq g^+$ and $f^-\leq g^-$.
(3): Note that both statements are equivalent to the condition that $\lvert f\rvert=0$ $\mu$-a.e.
(4): If $f=g$ $\mu$-a.e. then $f-g=0$ $\mu$-a.e., so
ie. $\int\!f\,d\mu=\int\!g\,d\mu$.
(5): Note that
and LHS is finite if and only if both terms in RHS are finite. $\qed$
Example: Counting measure
Let us work out an explicit example, when $\mu$ is the counting measure on $\Omega$, and $\Sigma=\mc P(\Omega)$. In this case, every function $f:\Omega\to\bb R$ is measurable.
For $f\geq0$, note that $f\chi_F$ is a nonnegative step function for every finite subset $F\subseteq\Omega$. Hence
On the other hand, for any nonnegative step function $0\leq\varphi\leq f$, let $A=\{\varphi>0\}$, and note that:
-
If $A$ is finite, then $\varphi\leq f\chi_A$, so
-
If $A$ is infinite, then $\varphi$ attains some nonzero value infinitely often (since the image of $A$ is finite), say $\lvert\varphi^{-1}(a)\rvert=\infty$. Then
so $I(\varphi)=\infty$. On the other hand, for any finite subset $B\subseteq\varphi^{-1}(a)$, we have
which is unbounded as we increase $\lvert B\rvert$.
In either case, we deduce that
where the supremum is taken over all finite subsets $F\subseteq\Omega$.
Comments (0)
Be the first to comment!